A Study on the Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Teaching Reform ofInterdisciplinary Integration in Finance Majors Based on the Three-DimensionalRestructuring of “Curriculum–Method–Assessment”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66438/skh.dssr.v2i4.88Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Finance Major, Interdisciplinary Integration, Teaching Reform, Curriculum SystemAbstract
The deep application of generative artificial intelligence and big data is reshaping the financial industry and imposing new interdisciplinary requirements on the knowledge and competence structure of finance graduates, while the traditional single-discipline training model faces a pronounced mismatch between supply and demand. Taking interdisciplinary integration as its analytical perspective, this paper combines literature review, policy text analysis, and reflection on teaching practice to review the research progress and policy requirements of integrating artificial intelligence into finance education, to identify the structural obstacles in the curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment of finance majors, and on this basis to propose a reform path centred on the three-dimensional restructuring of “curriculum–method–assessment.” The proposed path includes a modular “Finance + AI + X” course cluster, real-scenario-driven project-based and human–AI collaborative teaching, and a process-based, diversified and competency-oriented assessment system, so as to provide an actionable reference for interdisciplinary education in finance.
References
唐彬，吴晓光。《金融业大数据安全问题》，《中国金融》，2017，（23）：77-78。
吴岩。《积势蓄势谋势 识变应变求变》，《中国高等教育》，2021，（1）：4-7。
黄益平，黄卓。《中国的数字金融发展：现在与未来》，《经济学（季刊）》，2018，17（4）：1489-1502。
张钹，朱军，苏航。《迈向第三代人工智能》，《中国科学：信息科学》，2020，50（9）：1281-1302。
祝智庭，韩中美，黄昌勤。《教育人工智能（eAI）：人本人工智能的新范式》，《电化教育研究》，2021，42（1）：5-15。
教育部。《高等学校人工智能创新行动计划》[Z]。2018。
王佑镁，王旦，梁炜怡，柳晨晨。《“阿拉丁神灯”还是“潘多拉魔盒”：ChatGPT 教育应用的潜能与风险》，《现代远程教育研究》，2023，35（2）：48-56。
焦建利。《ChatGPT 助推学校教育数字化转型——人工智能时代学什么与怎么教》，《中国远程教育》，2023，43（4）：16-23。
祝智庭，戴岭，胡姣。《高意识生成式学习：AIGC 技术赋能的学习范式创新》，《电化教育研究》，2023，44（6）：5-14。
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244.
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Cao, L. (2022). AI in finance: Challenges, techniques, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(3), 1-38.
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The Race between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G.(2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223-238.
