Heterogeneous Implementation and Differential Effects: A ComparativeStudy on the Implementation Outcomes of the "Double Reduction" Policyin Public and Private Primary Schools in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66438/skh.dssr.v2i2.72Keywords:
Double reduction policy, Public primary school, Private Primary School, Policy Implementation, Educational EquityAbstract
This article intends to systematically compare the implementation logic ， practical path and multi-dimensional results of the 'double reduction' policy in public schools and private primary schools. In terms of school, it is found that there are different features in the implementation of the policy with inflexible compliance and strategic adjustment. Public primary schools have achieved good results in reducing academic burden, enhancing educational standards and services standardization, but are limited in providing personalized services. Contrarily, Private Primary Schools seem to be in compliance at first look but they have used covert arrangements and shifted responsibility towards the families.And it objectively promote structure education anxiety anxiety and the risks of reproducing society. Different policy results are due to differences in resource endowment, incentive mechanism, responsible subject, parent demographic factors, etc.
References
薛海平。《“双减”政策的理论逻辑、实施挑战与应对策略》,《 教育研究》, 2017, (1)：12-22.范先佐, 郭清扬。《“双减”背景下义务教育学校主阵地作用研究》, 《中国教育学刊》, 2021，(12),：1-6。
刘复兴, 董筱婷。《“双减”政策执行中地方政府的行为逻辑与调控策略——基于多案例的比较分析》, 《教育学报》, 2023，19(1)：78-92。
李涛, 苏洋。《校外培训治理的全球经验与中国“双减”政策的路径选择》, 《全球教育展望》, 2023， 52(2)：3-20。
陆一。《从“学业竞争”到“素养竞赛”：“双减”后教育生态的潜在风险与治理》, 《探索与争鸣》, 2022, (5)：108-116。
Wu Y, Gao J., (2023).Public and private schools ‘differentiation implementation of“Double Reduction” policy: a case study on two primary schools in Shanghai. Chinese Education & Society,56(3): 145-160.
